Entrapment, Surrender and Silence
The Jewish Journal, 2005
If recent press reports regarding the government case
against two former American Israel Public Affairs
Committee (AIPAC) employees are to be believed, then I
am increasingly outraged at the government’s case,
AIPAC’s response and the silence of the American
Jewish community.
A
word of caution is in order: Because grand jury
testimony is secret — or at least should be — we do not
know the full nature of the government’s case against
these individuals, and will not know it unless an
indictment is delivered and they are charged with a
specific crime or crimes. But press reports, if they are
accurate, point to an outrageous setup of the two and a
muteness on the part of our community.
According to recent reports in the Washington Post and
Ha’aretz, Keith Weissman, an AIPAC staff member, was
told by Lawrence Franklin, a midlevel Pentagon official
working in the office of Assistant Secretary of Defense
Doug Feith, secret information that the Iranian
government had targeted Israeli agents working with the
Kurds for death in Iraq. According to the newspapers, he
then took that information to his superior in AIPAC,
Steven Rosen, who made three calls: two to check out the
story and a third to warn the Israelis of risks to their
agents in the field.
Given what Weissman was told — the information turns out
to have been false, deliberately so because Franklin had
set him up — Rosen could assume that Israel, an ally of
the United States in the region, was working with the
full knowledge and consent — active or tacit — of the
United States. One may presume that the Israeli
government or Israeli intelligence would not operate in
such a sensitive area of American activity during
wartime without finding a way of informing their ally.
Secondly, an American government official working in an
office so friendly to Israel would not casually leak
such sensitive information. There was a purpose; the
information was to be conveyed elsewhere. In short, the
Israelis were to be warned.
This is not the Jonathan Pollard case.
Neither Rosen nor Weissman were American government
officials who had broken the laws of secrecy, the
commitments that come with any level of security
clearance, let alone top-secret clearance. They were not
agents of a foreign government (although it seems that
this is the goal of the U.S. government investigators
and prosecutors — to require Americans Jews working in
the U.S.-Israel foreign policy arena to declare
themselves foreign agents of Israel). The Israeli
government did not pay them for their services. They did
not transmit documents.
If
press reports are correct, they had acted as conduits
for information leaked to them that was designed to save
the lives of Israelis working with the consent and
knowledge of the United States — at purposes agreed upon
by the United States — to support American policy and
the interests of both the United States and Israel.
Little did they know and less could they imagine that
the information given to them was a sting operation by
government investigators who already knew Franklin, the
American government official, would be charged with
criminal misconduct for allegedly mishandling classified
documents by removing them from his office and taking
them to his home.
Rosen and Weissman were attempting to save lives, not
compromise lives or engage in a political vendetta. They
had every reason to believe that they were operating
with the active consent of the Pentagon, which had given
them the information in the first place. According to
press reports, they did not solicit the information;
they merely listened to what was told them.
AIPAC initially gave these two officials administrative
leave, continued them on salary and agreed to pay for
their defense. They were working for AIPAC and trying to
save Israeli lives, trying to further the alliance of
the United States and Israel.
It
seems that over the past month — in advance of its
much-heralded and highly successful conference that
featured U.S. government officials from Secretary of
State Condoleezza Rice on down — AIPAC caved and fired
these officials. It has told its key supporters that it
will continue to fund their defense, but it has left
them to fend for themselves economically at a time when
both men will be preoccupied with their own defense and
virtually unemployable.
Both of these men have made important contributions to
the U.S.-Israel relationship — Weissman, an expert on
Iran, and Rosen, a principal architect of the
U.S.-Israel strategic cooperative relationship for more
than 20 years.
And
why the silence of the American Jewish leadership, which
should be outraged by government entrapment on civil
liberties grounds, and which should be furious that the
bait the government chose to use was Israeli lives?
I
lived in Washington when Pollard was arrested, and was
the editor of a Jewish newspaper who joined the chorus
of condemnation of both Pollard and the Israeli
government for their ineptitude and stupidity in using
an American Jew as an agent. It sent a chill throughout
Washington officialdom, especially among a new
generation of committed Jews, supporters of Israel, who
were working throughout the government in every level of
government service and in every agency.
This is different.
Weissman did what any person in his position is supposed
to do. He went to his superior with important, albeit
secret, information that purported to tell him that
Israeli lives were at risk — immediate, tangible risk,
information given to him in a quasi-official fashion,
but what he presumed to be a most reliable source. And
Rosen acted on such information to save the lives of
agents working in direct alliance and with the presumed
consent of the United States.
This was not a question of dual loyalty or conflicting
loyalty, but of saving lives. From the perspective of
Jewish tradition, if press reports are to be believed,
they acted honorably in a manner prescribed by
tradition, and Jews should not be adverse to defending
those traditions, affirming those values and to
supporting these men.
|